Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(42)
For the solutions with only non-permeating solutes, the value of the grouped solute osmotic virial coefficient was found to have a minimal effect on predictions: a maximum 10% difference in predicted volume.
However, a very recent study done in septic patients has shown that the significance of both CVP and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) to predict fluid responsiveness was poor and that a CVP of less than 8 mm Hg and a PAOP of less than 12 mm Hg predicted volume responsiveness with a positive predictive value of only about 50% [ 31].
A SV increase induced by PLR of 15% or more predicted volume response with a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 93%, positive predictive value of 91%, and a negative predictive value of 85%.
A SV increase induced by PLR of ≥15% predicted volume responsiveness with a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 93%, positive predictive value of 91% and negative predictive value of 85%.
The predicted volume fraction and size are in reasonable agreement with extraction experiments for M7C3.
The predicted volume fractions of constituent phases were also compared with experimental measurements by a combination of metallography and transmission electron microscopy.
Similar(18)
Predicting the dominant species based on a linear discriminant analysis had an overall accuracy of only 76 % at best, which degraded the accuracies of the predicted volumes.
Predicted basal area (G) and mean top height values for each site index were used in conjunction with the stand-level volume functions to provide predicted volumes.
To determine how closely the predicted volumes matched the actual volumes, the two sets of predicted volumes were plotted against the measured volumes of the resulting LDs (Fig. 5b).
The parameter estimates were then used to generate predicted volumes at weekly intervals after assignment to diet.
For example, START domains from HD-Zip transcription factors ATML1 and PDF2, which exhibit activity in the yeast assay, have predicted volumes of 770 and 720 Å, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com