Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Using the interpolated results of the FEM model, it is possible to calculate how predicted tolerances on strain gauge position affect the precision of Y measurements as shown in Table 5.
Similar(59)
The optimized results and predicted tolerance are demonstrated and discussed.
In Fig. 11 it can be seen that for a target tolerance of ±0.015 mm, the predicted C pk is 1.5 and from Fig. 12 it can be deciphered that for a target C pk of 2.0, the predicted tolerance is ±0.020 mm.
Open image in new window Fig. 9 Graphical plot for center hole diameter precision boring with predicted C pk of 3.27 for predetermined tolerance of ±0.050 mm Open image in new window Fig. 10 Graphical Plot for center hole diameter precision boring with predicted tolerance ±0.027 mm for predetermined C pk of 2.000 of 6σ levels.
Also it is observed that for center hole diameter precision boring with predetermined C pk of 2.000 catering to 6σ levels, the predicted tolerance ±0.027 mm leads to a generous improvement in curtailing down the existing tolerance levels from the existing ±0.050 to ±0.027 mm, i.e., almost by 50%.
Besides the two most influential reactions, only a few others had a significant individual contribution to the predicted tolerance.
Identifying biomarkers in predicting tolerance or early diagnosing rejection is essential to direct personalized management.
Provean (see footnote 23) predicts tolerance for mutations and scores them as deleterious or not deleterious (Chio et al. 2012).
Physical fitness for treatment is currently subjectively assessed by means of the PS score, which may be inadequate in predicting tolerance to treatment.
DNA methylation level of selected Th1 and Th2 cytokines genes could be used as a potential biomarker in predicting tolerance acquisition.
The G-scores, another indirect way to predict tolerance but based on a comparison with somatic (expressed) genes, ranged from -2.689 to 0.518 (Table 3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com