predicted to

USAGE SUMMARY

"predicted to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe something as a likely future event or outcome. For example, "The forecast is predicted to bring rain this afternoon."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

And the trend is predicted to continue.

The New York Times

What is the weather predicted to do?

The Guardian - Travel

Commercial tenants are confidently predicted to follow.

The Guardian

Meat prices are predicted to rocket.

The Guardian

The opening act is predicted to peak around 5 a.m.

The New York Times - Science

Apple is predicted to soon be worth an estimated $1tn.

The Guardian

Costs are predicted to exceed a trillion yuan.

The Guardian

"They'll leave by Friday," DiCarmine predicted to Davis.

The New Yorker

Temperatures are predicted to be in the low 50's.

The New York Times - Sports

Child malnutrition is predicted to increase by 20% by 2050.

The Guardian

This year, they are predicted to rise even faster.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "predicted to", ensure your prediction is based on reliable data or evidence to maintain credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "predicted to" when the outcome is highly uncertain or speculative; instead, use phrases like "may" or "could" to indicate possibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "predicted to" functions as a verb phrase used to express a future expectation or forecast. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's grammatically correct and widely employed. The examples show its use in various contexts, indicating a projected outcome based on available information.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

41%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "predicted to" is a versatile and grammatically sound construction used to express future expectations. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's correct and frequently used. Its high frequency and presence across diverse sources—including News & Media and Science—underscore its broad applicability. When employing "predicted to", ensure the prediction is grounded in reliable data and avoid overstating the certainty of the outcome. Consider alternatives like "expected to" or "forecast to" to fine-tune the nuance of your statement.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

forecast to

Replaces "predicted" with "forecast", a synonym with a slightly more statistical connotation.

expected to

Uses "expected" instead of "predicted", suggesting a strong anticipation based on current trends.

anticipated to

Substitutes "predicted" with "anticipated", emphasizing the act of looking forward to something.

projected to

Replaces "predicted" with "projected", implying a more formal estimation or calculation.

estimated to

Uses "estimated" to convey an approximation based on available data, similar to a prediction.

likely to

Expresses probability or likelihood rather than a direct prediction.

foreseen to

Replaces "predicted" with "foreseen", suggesting a view into the future.

destined to

Implies a future event is inevitable or predetermined.

slated to

Indicates that something is scheduled or planned for the future.

speculated to

Uses "speculated" when the prediction is based on conjecture rather than firm evidence.

FAQs

How to use "predicted to" in a sentence?

The phrase "predicted to" is used to indicate a future outcome that is expected based on current trends or data. For example, "The economy is predicted to grow next year."

What can I say instead of "predicted to"?

You can use alternatives like "expected to", "forecast to", or "projected to" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "predicted to" or "predicted that"?

"Predicted to" is followed by a verb in its base form (e.g., "predicted to increase"), while "predicted that" introduces a clause (e.g., "predicted that the price will increase"). Both are grammatically correct but used in different sentence structures.

What's the difference between "predicted to" and "expected to"?

While both phrases suggest a future outcome, "predicted to" often implies a more data-driven or analytical forecast, while "expected to" can be based on more general anticipation or common sense.