Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Table 1 shows the primer nucleotide sequence used and the predicted length of the amplicon for each primer pair.
However, full-length GCC185 and all fragments were ~30% shorter than the predicted lengths for coiled-coils with the same number of residues (the cartoons in Figure 3 figure supplement 1, 2 are drawn to scale for each portion of the molecules and summarized in Figure 3 figure supplement 4).
Values within the bars indicate expected or measured, mean lengths in nm; shown below are values for the numbers of molecules measured and the overall percentage difference between the measured lengths and predicted lengths for each fragment.
These fixed effects could be interpreted as the predicted length of stay for a given patient (here given by the reference category in Table 3).
Our results differ from the predicted length of 20 nt for miR172c annotated in the miRBase database.
Adjustment for the other covariables did not substantially alter the growth rates in each time period (table 2). Figure 2 shows the predicted length trajectory for each of the ethnic and sex groups.
Figure 5 shows the deviation between the length of the extracted tools which subjects first used to probe for food, and the predicted length if they were choosing at random (see Materials and Methods).
Proximity ligation is used to demonstrate that the N- and C-termini of GCC185 can be located within 40 nm of each other (despite a predicted length of ~200 nm for a rigid GCC185 molecule).
Also corrected for confounders including APACHE predicted length of stay and mechanical ventilation bCorrected for exposure bias (for FFP transfusion) summarized in propensity score including admission type, APACHE IV score and sepsis.
Also corrected for confounders including APACHE predicted length of stay and mechanical ventilation.
The predicted lengths of amplification products for TNF-α and β-actin were 372 and 233 base pairs, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com