Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(17)
In particular, intake of Y1 as a percentage of the predicted intake was the most variable.
Sorting was calculated as the actual intake of each fraction expressed as a percentage of the predicted intake.
Sorting activity for each fraction was calculated as actual intake expressed as a percentage of the predicted intake.
Sorting activity [for each fraction, NDF and physically effective NDF (peNDF)] was calculated as the actual intake expressed as a percentage of the predicted intake.
Sorting was calculated as the actual intake of each particle size fraction expressed as a percentage of the predicted intake of that fraction.
Intake of the longest particles expressed as a percentage of the predicted intake was 73.2% in a tie-stall barn and 63.3% in a free-stall barn.
Similar(43)
Time 1 parental intakes significantly predicted intakes of young adults for fruit (P = 0.044), vegetables (P = 0.041) and dairy foods (P = 0.008).
Predicted intakes at baseline assumed to be the same as predicted TEE on the basis that this is what would be required to allow weight stability.
Combining both series of factors in the same model represents significant progress in predicting intake at grazing in a mechanistic way.
The best equations for predicting intake included a combination of mean retention time and forage acid detergent fiber (ADF) content (reciprocal and quadratic); that for digestibility included permanganate lignin (reciprocal), and the quadratic for ruminating and retention time.
Home availability and TV viewing did not predict intake.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com