Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
We report sensitivity/recall as the percentage of positive labeled instances of PHI that were predicted as positive, specificity as the percentage of negative (unlabeled) instances that were predicted as negative, precision (or positive predictive value) as the percentage of positive predictions that were correct and accuracy as the percentage of predictions that were correct.
BCKDK and PSENEN were predicted as negative controls.
By definition, sensitivity refers to the proportion of actual positives which are correctly predicted as positive; specificity is the proportion of actual negatives which are correctly predicted as negative; while PPV is the proportion of predicted positives which are actual positive.
A false negative (FN) occurs when the outcome is incorrectly predicted as negative when it is actually positive.
A small number of edge antigenic residues (residues 38, 40, 291 on chain A and residues 42, 45, 56 on chain B) are predicted as negative.
Comparing these two labels makes it possible to define the True Positives (TP) as the positive examples that were predicted as positive, the True Negatives (TN) as the negative examples that were predicted as negative, the False Positives (FP) as the negative examples that were predicted as positive, and the False Negatives (FN) as the positive examples that were predicted as negative.
Similar(51)
We assume that there are δ = | T ′ − T | new annotations; of those, α terms were predicted as negatives by the predictor, whereas β terms were predicted as positives.
Sensitivity is the fraction of the real positives that are correctly predicted as positives and specificity is the fraction of the real negatives that are correctly predicted as negatives.
Figure 9 Shows the withdrawn drug compounds predicted as false negative.
Rule X: If the frequency of shared MIPS functional term is more than 5.056, the protein pair will be predicted as a negative interaction pair with high confidence.
Before 11 weeks' gestation 16/865 (1.85%) babies tested were falsely predicted as RHD negative.
More suggestions(15)
perceived as negative
computed as negative
calculated as negative
determined as negative
reflected as negative
provided as negative
constructed as negative
evaluated as negative
incorporated as negative
prepared as negative
predicted as membrane
predicted as much
predicted as cytoplasmic
predicted as safe
predicted as Other
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com