Exact(5)
Fig. 2. Temporal change of ash components during 2011 eruption (January 19 August 31) and its precursory stage (August 2008 May 2010).
Pc: precursory stage, Tr: terminal stage, P1: pulse 1, P2: pulse 2, Inc: increasing period, Pk: peak period, Dec: decreasing period.
The Precursory Stage is characterized by the presence of a low-level thermal anomaly in the 2.3 μm band, which is considered a pre-eruption thermal anomaly.
The examined eruptions cover the entire 2011 eruptive activity (January to August 2011) and its precursory stage (August 2008 to June 2010).
Based on the detailed analysis of the time-series variations in its thermal anomalies, this eruptive sequence was segmented into a Precursory Stage, Pulse 1, Pulse 2 and a Terminal Stage.
Similar(55)
Fig. 9 Schematic figure showing the preparation and precursory stages of the 2014 phreatic eruption of Mount Ontake.
However, the fundamental processes related to preparatory and precursory stages of phreatic eruptions are poorly known.
By relocating shallow VT and LP earthquakes and applying a matched-filter detection technique to seismic data recorded before the 2014 phreatic eruption of Mount Ontake, we reconstructed the earthquake catalog beneath the craters, which provides new insights into the preparatory and precursory stages of the eruption.
After a precursory phreatic stage (2008 to 2010), the 2011 Shinmoe-dake eruption entered a phreatomagmatic stage on January 19, a sub-Plinian and lava accumulation stage at the end of January, a vulcanian stage in February April, and a second phreatomagmatic stage in June August.
Figure 9 depicts a distribution of detected lactone modifications in the heavily sialylated glycans that indicated a large percentage of polysialylated species present in the precursory lactonization stage (1 2 lactones detected).
Firstly, a precursory phase of Pliocene age made up of sheeted drifts represents an initial phase of deposition under bottom-current activity that is correlated with the first stages of an enhanced MOW at about 3.5 Ma.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com