Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(39)
Since this ratio is easily calibrated and reproduced at such a level of precision, errors as low as ±2 million years at a confidence level of 95 percent are routinely obtained on lead-207 lead-206 ages.
a Low-density image showing precision errors.
Figure 10 Impact of location precision errors.
The results show that: all precision errors are smaller than 15% and average precision errors are smaller than 10%.
The objective is to find the relation between the non-rating attributes and precision errors.
Precision errors were 3.5% or less for all micro-structural indices.
Similar(21)
The precision error for these methods was 6.0%.
Aiming at studying the impact of the precision error of the UE localization method, a precision error modeled as a Gaussian distribution has been introduced.
For the main categories cross-likelihood ratio test using GMMs gives 0.5% precision error followed by Euclidean distance having 1.0% precision error.
which leads to a precision error of 11.84% and an h-index error of 12.63%.
The results are precision error rates for the main categories and the subcategories.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com