precipitated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "precipitated with" is not commonly used in written English and may not convey the intended meaning clearly.
It can be used in scientific or technical contexts where a reaction or event is caused or triggered by something else, but it may require additional clarification. Example: "The chemical reaction was precipitated with the addition of a catalyst."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The supernatant was precipitated with 90% ethanol.

Chemistry Central Journal

Crude extract was precipitated with ammonium sulphate (100%).

Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology

The lysates were precipitated with anti-GFP antibody.

Protein & Cell

The solution was precipitated with 95% ethanol (120 ml).

Chemistry Central Journal

The RNA was precipitated with 0.5 mL isopropanol.

Botanical Studies

The proteins were precipitated with cooled acetone and lyophilized.

Protein & Cell

The supernatant was transferred and precipitated with isopropanol.

Botanical Studies

The product was then precipitated with methanol and ethanol.

International Journal Of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture

Finally, DNA is precipitated with ethanol.

Plosone

The modified RNAs were precipitated with ethanol.

Plosone

RNA fragments were precipitated with ethanol.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "precipitated with", ensure the context clearly indicates the substance or condition that caused the precipitation. Clarity is key in scientific writing.

Common error

Avoid using "precipitated with" in general writing. This phrase is highly specialized for scientific or technical contexts. Using more common terms like "caused by" or "triggered by" will provide better clarity in general writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "precipitated with" primarily functions as a passive verb phrase in scientific and technical writing. It describes an action performed on a subject, indicating that a substance has been separated from a solution due to the addition of another substance or a specific condition. Examples from Ludwig show this usage in contexts involving proteins, DNA, and RNA.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "precipitated with" is a technical phrase exclusively used within scientific and technical domains to describe a chemical precipitation process. Ludwig's examples overwhelmingly support this usage, showing it's common in scientific research papers when detailing experimental procedures. As a result, avoid this phrase in general writing, and only employ it when describing specific scientific methodologies. The most appropriate alternatives such as "induced by", "triggered by", or "caused by" would not be proper alternatives since "precipitated with" has a very precise chemical meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

induced by

Focuses on the action being caused or brought about by something.

triggered by

Implies a sudden start or initiation of an event.

caused by

A general term indicating direct causation.

brought about by

Highlights the result of an action or event.

initiated by

Emphasizes the beginning or starting point of a process.

sparked by

Suggests a sudden and energetic beginning.

resulted from

Focuses on the outcome or consequence of an action.

led to by

Indicates a sequence of events where one leads to another.

given rise to by

Highlights the emergence or creation of something.

occasioned by

Suggests that something provided the opportunity for an event to occur.

FAQs

How is "precipitated with" used in scientific writing?

In scientific writing, "precipitated with" describes the process where a substance is separated from a solution by adding another substance. For example, "The protein was precipitated with ammonium sulfate."

What are some alternatives to "precipitated with"?

Depending on the context, alternatives to "precipitated with" include "induced by", "triggered by", or "caused by". However, "precipitated with" is the most precise term when referring to chemical precipitation.

Is it appropriate to use "precipitated with" in everyday conversation?

No, "precipitated with" is a technical term primarily used in scientific or technical contexts. It would sound unnatural in everyday conversation. Use more common phrases like "caused by" or "resulted from" instead.

What is the difference between "precipitated with" and "resulted in"?

"Precipitated with" refers specifically to the chemical process of precipitation, while "resulted in" is a more general term indicating that one event caused another. For example, "Adding ethanol precipitated with DNA," but "The experiment resulted in a discovery."