Your English writing platform
Discover Ludwig"precedent for" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when you want to refer to something that has been done or decided in the past and is used as an example for the present. For example: "The court's ruling on this latest tax case is set a precedent for legal challenges in the future."
Exact(60)
"But there's precedent for this.
"There's no precedent for this.
There is precedent for this.
There was precedent for this.
There's a precedent for this.
There is precedent for him to consider.
There is a precedent for such involvement.
There was a precedent for this.
There is precedent for the disparity.
There is no precedent for that".
We have no precedent for it.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com