"precedent condition" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is often used in legal or formal writing to refer to a condition that must be met before something else can happen. Example: The contract explicitly stated that the payment of the remaining balance was a precedent condition to the delivery of the goods.
For these reasons, economic and specific application of pharmaceuticals is the basis for best efficient therapy however, a precedent condition for this approach is the precise diagnosis.
Reduced theta phase-coherence in mismatch compared with the no precedent condition could suggest active decoupling between 2 areas and could reflect suppression (e.g., Gross et al. 2004).
The first step comprised of comparing the precedent mismatch to the no precedent condition for same speaker (controlling for low-level sensory differences) both pre- and post-naming.
There have not, however, been any studies of endometriosis, 11 as a precedent condition to PD. Osteoporosis is also associated with estrogen; reduced cumulative exposure to estrogen increases the risk of osteoporosis.
We contrasted precedent mismatch and no precedent conditions for the same speaker to identify cortical areas that revealed coherence differences relative to a particular reference site.
Both breast and endometrial cancers have been examined as precedent conditions in case-control studies of PD, and no association has been found; 13, 14 however, many studies have reported overall reduced cancer rates or mortality in PD patients.
There are two common types of conditions: conditions precedent and conditions subsequent.
Red color denotes areas that are coupled significantly stronger with the respective seed area in the mismatch compared with the no-precedent condition (mismatch > no precedent), whereas blue color denotes the reverse effect (mismatch < no precedent).
This is further in line with the reported sensor-level effects (see Fig. 3), where the same-speaker, precedent mismatch condition revealed the strongest theta-power increases.
Thus, observing the strongest mentalizing brain network activation in the same-speaker, precedent mismatch condition would corroborate the general view that participants make use of common ground processing for resolving referential ambiguity in the current paradigm.
To create the best opportunity for finding mentalizing effects, we specifically targeted those trials within the same-speaker, precedent mismatch condition in which the behavioral evidence suggested engagement of mentalizing processes, either through a "different picture" response or through a "same picture" response with a particularly slow response time (see Methods for details).
