"precedent case" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in contexts related to the law, in sentences such as: "The judge's ruling in this case sets a precedent for future cases." The use of "precedent case" implies that the case in question has established a legal principle that will be considered in any similar cases that come up in the future.
As an example, he referred to the precedent case he tried in late 1997, after the government accused Microsoft of illegally tying a Web browser to Windows.
The British judges did form a "provisional view" that the precedent case at the ECJ, known as Digital Rights Ireland, "does not lay down mandatory requirements of EU law with which national legislation must comply.
If it succeeds in this task, it issue a REFRESH-REQ as in the precedent case. .
Replacement of storm-damaged buildings is also not allowed, and a precedent case on Popham Beach, Maine required that the owner remove an unpermitted building from a site where an earlier structure was damaged.
In short, the ruling in the second case must not be inconsistent with the result in the precedent case, but the court is otherwise free to make a ruling narrower than that in the precedent.
The effect of distinguishing, then, is that the later court is free not to follow a precedent that, prima facie, applies to it, by making a ruling which is narrower than that made in the precedent case.
However, these models have not accounted for the ways that attorneys use middle-level normative background knowledge (1) to organize multi-case arguments, (2) to reason about the significance of differences between cases, and (3) to assess the relevance of precedent cases to a given problem situation.
So later courts whose case-facts fall within the scope of the ratio must consider the precedent, but do so in order to consider whether the differences in facts between the later and the precedent cases justify deciding the cases differently.
There are precedent cases of virus-mediated in vivo expression systems as functional assays of candidate genes in insects [ 26, 31].
The facts and issues shown in precedent cases reflect this distrust of patients toward doctors, and can increase the distrust that doctors feel toward patients if they are read without appropriate instructions.
Searching for precedents, Case and Deaton mention what happened in the United States at the height of the AIDS epidemic.
