Sentence examples for pre-emptive interventions from inspiring English sources

Are these pre-emptive interventions a relic of bygone imperial days?

Woodrow Wilson's occupation of Haiti in 1915, Lyndon Johnson's dispatch of Marines to the Dominican Republic in 1965 and Ronald Reagan's invasion of Grenada in 1983 are just a few of the pre-emptive interventions launched to protect American dominance in this hemisphere.

If the period of time preceding a seizure can be reliably identified, either by child or caretaker, there may be a role for pre-emptive interventions.

These methods are primarily concerned with pre-emptive interventions that can be completed before the arrival of the pathogen.

The earliest and potentially most effective means of addressing this disorder is by recognition of patients who are at risk and pre-emptive interventions designed to minimize the chances for development of IAH.

He made it clear that he thought it was indeed possible and that his mindset mirrored -- and perhaps even went beyond -- President Bush's doctrine of pre-emptive intervention to head off terrorist threats.

Now America is developing a similar argument for its own pre-emptive intervention in cases such as Iraq, where it suspects a dictator of planning to develop weapons of mass destruction.

And he seemingly reaffirmed that strategy in a speech at West Point, arguing that American foreign policy is now based on a doctrine of pre-emptive intervention against its ghastliest enemies.

Dodd-Frank created pre-emptive intervention powers, at the behest of Treasury and the Federal Reserve, with part of the rationale being that these could be used to prevent a megabank's slow death spiral from becoming a market panic.

No one in the US, in Europe, in Turkey or in the region is willing to engage in the kind of massive, pre-emptive intervention that might – might – preclude the aforementioned scenarios, especially since such a move would probably entail its own disastrous consequences.

Several Sudanese elders in the camp have suggested that the State Department's money would be better spent encouraging peace in Sudan, echoing the philosophy of several human rights organizations that have argued that carefully orchestrated, pre-emptive intervention could stem the tide of displacement worldwide.