Sentence examples for pragmatic rationality from inspiring English sources

What is undeniable, however, is the significant role that pragmatic rationality plays in the Bayesian approach to managing one's beliefs.

They aim to show that deviating from the probability axioms leads to irrational choices, which seems to show at best that obeying the probability axioms is part of pragmatic rationality, as opposed to epistemic irrationality.

Perhaps the decisive factor in the survival of the Tunisian democratic experiment has been the pragmatic rationality of its political actors and their willingness to make concessions and reach deals, instead of pushing the state of political polarisation to its limits.

Finally, one might distinguish between practical rationality and theoretical rationality.

Philosophers have different understandings of practical rationality.

It is important to recognize the distinction between theoretical moral arguments for theism (arguments intended to show that God exists), and pragmatic moral arguments for the rationality of theistic belief.

As a theory of rationality and knowledge, his theory of knowledge-constitutive interests is both pragmatic and pluralistic: pragmatic, inasmuch as human interests constitute knowledge; pluralistic, in that different forms of inquiry and knowledge emerge from different core interests.

In the following, we look at two similar, but distinct possibilities of treating semantic meaning in approaches that spell out pragmatic reasoning as chains of (higher-order) reasoning about interlocutors' rationality.

The pragmatic additions to the underdetermined output of syntax are governed by a rationality principle called an optimization procedure that is spelled out as a series of constraints.

Those two features are: (1) the introduction of a formal apparatus for inductive logic; (2) the introduction of a pragmatic self-defeat test (as illustrated by Dutch Book Arguments) for epistemic rationality as a way of extending the justification of the laws of deductive logic to include a justification for the laws of inductive logic.

But it is the idea that violation of the probability axioms involves inconsistent evaluations that supports retention of the probabilist's thesis that they are norms of rationality, despite recognition that violating the axioms is not necessarily a pragmatic defect.