Some Finnish (practitioner, science, social groups) and Slovenian (economy, practitioner groups) interviewees mainly refer to the future when speaking about the employment effect.
For instance, German (economy, practitioner groups), Norwegian (practitioner, science groups) and Spanish (economy, practitioner groups) interviewees refer to an already existing synergy, but they also expect this aspect to be relevant in the future.
Possible negative effects on soil nutrient balance mentioned in all countries are, for instance, rooted in an intensified extraction of wood (residues, crowns, stumps, whole trees) and following nutrient losses (Germany: all groups except social, economy; Norway: conservation, practitioner, science groups).
The problem is, somehow I'm a practicing scientist who is a recipient, a proponent, and a practitioner of science education yet I have no idea how science should be taught.
At the meeting, Whewell said that just as the practitioners of art are called "artists", the practitioners of science ought to be called "scientists", indicating that they should no longer be called philosophers.[1] Indeed, before the early nineteenth century, people like Newton were called "philosophers", or more specifically, "natural philosophers".
This is the sort of puzzle that has scientists and practitioners of science and technology studies (STS) at each other's throats.
In the intervening years, a hundred popularisers, practitioners and science historians have tried to tell much the same story, each time with more up-to-date information and a more acute sense of contemporary awareness.
For two days at the end of August, senior practitioners of science advice, academics and communication experts from 45 countries will converge on Auckland, New Zealand for two days of intensive discussions.
But there are solider adversaries among the more radical practitioners of "science and technology studies" (STS sociologists and historians of science who treat it as a social activity like any other with no privileged claims to truth.
As a columnist for The Irish Times wrote, because the decision "officially brings into the international sporting community athletes who have undergone a radical and life-altering course of hormone treatment, it is bound to provide a further smoke screen for the malevolent practitioners of science who engineer the substances that seduce athletes".
Three hundred years later the number of periodical titles published in the world was estimated at more than 60,000, reflecting not only growth in the number of practitioners of science and expansion of its body of knowledge through specialization but also a maturing of the system of rewards that encourages scientists to publish.
