Sentence examples for practices when compared with from inspiring English sources

In 1998 Japanese companies were ranked dead last in their corporate governance practices when compared with their U.S., U.K., French and German peers in categories such as shareholder rights and allowing takeovers, according to a survey by Stephen Davis, the head of Massachusetts-based Davis Global Advisors and an authority on global corporate governance.

These principles can be used by nursing personnel to raise questions about the validity of current practices when compared with evidence-informed expectations based on population health outcome goals [ 9].

And he insisted that she come to meetings accompanied by lower-level managers who could give specific answers to his detailed questions; a change in practice when compared with her warm one-on-one meetings with Mr. Holloway's predecessor as deputy mayor, Stephen Goldsmith.

Vignettes are reported to be a valid way to collect information about the quality of clinical practice when compared with standardised patients (the gold standard method) [ 22].

Nevertheless, naturalistic studies have the advantage of using doses of APDs that are closer to those applied in daily practice, when compared with randomized clinical trials.

Most importantly for the selection of medical students for future rural practice, our study highlighted a difference in the way students from rural backgrounds perceive rural life and medical practice when compared with their counterparts from urban backgrounds.

Recording consultations is crucial to understanding the mechanism that underlies the impact of the production of an agenda on the clinical consultation, and its subsequent utilisation in practice, when compared with usual care.

However, an open-label setting does provide a more realistic approximation of clinical practice when compared with a double-blind study, and a large study such as this can yield a substantial body of safety and tolerability data.

This Phase III diagnostic trial 15 will evaluate the clinical validity of SeptiFast for the identification of healthcare-associated bloodstream infection in the setting of UK adult intensive-care practice when compared with the current blood-culture standards.

Those who thought female genital cutting is not harmful were more likely to favour the continuation of the practice when compared with those who thought that FGC is harmful to the girl who undergoes the process.

Data such as these are helpful to the clinician because they demonstrate that, despite an older and sicker population, the efficacy of CRT-D as shown in clinical trials translates into effectiveness in clinical practice when compared with medical therapy alone.