Following a discussion of the nomenclature of acute pain-related practices, we discuss the historical evolution and modern role of APM teams, including the use of traditional, as well as complementary and alternative, therapies for treating acute pain.
We outline ways in which this methodology might make substantial contributions in frailty research and clinical practice, and we discuss potential obstacles in its operationalization.
We argue that an organization's position on this continuum entails important implications for its design of talent management practices, which we discuss extensively.
Specific practices that we discuss include the use of controlled drainage, chemical treatment of waters and soils, receiving ditch management, and wetlands.
As a consequence these processes have reflexive implications for the social organization of practice, a point we discuss further below.
If this outcome is a useable indicator of practice quality (which we discuss below), then one would hope to see correlations with other performance measures such as QOF indicators.
(Phase I: Patient 1, Practice 4) We discussed with staff and patients the feasibility of and preferences for alternative methods for routinely communicating normal results that would impact less on practice time and resource yet still meet patient preferences.
The reported number of "second trimester serum screening" was not consistent with the clinical practice, so we discussed this issue with the midwives working in the catchment area of this hospital.
Groups such as the Cochrane Collaboration influenced how local researchers and policy makers thought about evidence-based practice and policy, as we discuss below.
If it qualifies as a city by that of population or any other reasonable metric, why then do we tend to neglect Dadaab and the all too many places like it when we discuss emergent practices of urbanism?
