Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Both kinds of errors occurred most frequently when learning a random mapping (p<0.01, Wilcoxon ranksum test), whereas there were practically no errors when learning the identity mapping.
Similar(59)
Some had practically no carbohydrates, and some had practically no fat.
(E) No error.
Practically no-one does this.
Only for small frame sizes slightly higher frame error rates using the estimates could be observed, but for larger frames, practically no differences in terms of frame error rates could be seen.
In addition to being substantially less invasive, there are practically no complications, little or no sampling errors and small observer related variability.
He makes no errors.
There are practically always errors in input data erroneous species presence absence data, structural and parametric uncertainty in predictive habitat models, and lack of correspondence between temporal presence and long-run persistence.
No errors.
No errors should appear.
There should be no errors.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com