Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
practically everyone
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "practically everyone" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that almost all people in a particular group or context are included, with a slight allowance for exceptions. Example: "At the party, practically everyone was dancing and having a great time."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Formal & Business
Academia
Science
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Practically everyone voted for her.
News & Media
Practically everyone had a story to tell.
News & Media
And practically everyone speaks fashion today.
News & Media
Practically everyone in N.Y. was then immune.
News & Media
But practically everyone signs a confidentiality agreement.
News & Media
So did practically everyone else I knew.
News & Media
"Practically everyone was Caucasian," Ms. Liu said.
News & Media
"Practically everyone who wants to work already has a job".
News & Media
All farmland was occupied, and practically everyone was hungry.
News & Media
Because practically everyone I see is clutching an iPhone.
News & Media
Practically everyone knew the words to every song.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "practically everyone" when you want to convey that a statement applies to nearly all members of a group, acknowledging that there might be a few exceptions. This creates a more nuanced and accurate depiction than simply saying "everyone".
Common error
Avoid using "practically everyone" when the statement genuinely applies to only a significant portion of the group, not nearly all. Exaggerating can undermine your credibility. Use phrases like "many people" or "a significant number of people" instead to reflect the true scope.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "practically everyone" functions as a quantifier, modifying a noun to indicate that the action or state applies to almost all members of a group. Ludwig shows that this phrase indicates a high degree of inclusion, while acknowledging potential exceptions.
Frequent in
News & Media
70%
Formal & Business
10%
Academia
8%
Less common in
Science
6%
Wiki
4%
Reference
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "practically everyone" is a commonly used quantifier that conveys near-universal inclusion while acknowledging potential exceptions. Ludwig's analysis confirms that it is grammatically correct and frequently used across various sources, especially in News & Media. When using "practically everyone", it's essential to consider whether the context genuinely supports this near-universal application to avoid overgeneralization. The related phrases, such as "almost all people" and "nearly everyone", offer alternative ways to express similar meanings with slightly different nuances. With a source quality score of 84 and an expert rating of 4.5, "practically everyone" demonstrates its reliability and widespread acceptance in English writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
nearly everyone
Indicates a close proximity to 'everyone' but acknowledges a small exclusion.
almost all people
Emphasizes the quantity of people included, focusing on 'almost' complete inclusion.
virtually every person
Uses 'virtually' to highlight the near-complete inclusion, with minimal exceptions.
the vast majority of people
Highlights that only very few individuals aren't included.
pretty much everyone
Uses informal language to convey a similar meaning of near-total inclusion.
almost without exception
Focuses on the lack of exceptions, implying widespread inclusion.
the overwhelming majority
Emphasizes the strength of the majority, suggesting very few are excluded.
for the most part, everyone
Acknowledges minor exclusions, stating that 'mostly' people are included.
by and large, everyone
Indicates a broad inclusion, with minor and inconsequential exceptions.
in effect, everyone
Suggests that for all intents and purposes, everyone is included, even if not literally.
FAQs
What does "practically everyone" mean?
The phrase "practically everyone" means almost everyone. It implies that a large majority of people are included in a statement, with the understanding that there might be a few exceptions.
How is "practically everyone" different from "everyone"?
"Everyone" suggests that all members of a group are included without exception. "Practically everyone" acknowledges that there might be a few exceptions, making it a more nuanced and often more accurate statement. You can use phrases like "almost everyone" or "nearly everyone" as similar alternatives.
When is it appropriate to use "practically everyone" in writing?
It's appropriate to use "practically everyone" when a statement applies to the vast majority of a group but not necessarily every single member. This phrase adds precision and avoids overgeneralization.
What are some alternatives to "practically everyone"?
Alternatives to "practically everyone" include "almost all people", "virtually every person", or "the vast majority of people". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested