Sentence examples for ppm I from inspiring English sources

The results showed that upon bubbling of air containing from 0.3 up to 18.5 ppm FA through immobilized AOX in the range of 1.3 26.6 U g−1 of the gel resulted in essential decrease of FA concentration in the outlet gas phase (less than 0.02 0.03 ppm, i.e. 10-fold less than the threshold limit value).

The answer appears to be "no". Over two-thirds of the cases with substantially over-fertilized crops (up to 140 lbs/ac) did not show CSNT values in the excessive range (>2000 ppm), i.e. a majority of those cases were false negatives.

Inhibitor evaluation was done in two stages, in the first stage each inhibitor is kept at a dosage of 100 ppm if no tube blocking is observed during 15 min then the dosage is decreased to 75 ppm if the tube is blocked at 75 ppm, i.e., the MIC of the inhibitor is between 100 and 75 ppm the same process is continued for the three inhibitors until the MIC range of the inhibitors are determined.

The manual preparation of 68Ga-DOTATATE reduces the 68Ge content to less than 1 ppm, i.e. the application of 200 MBq 68Ga-DOTATATE to the patient leads to an unwanted incorporation of long-lived 68Ge in the region of 200 Bq or even less [2],[2]].

Air concentrations are given in ppm, i.e. ml gas per m gas-air mixture, where 1 ppm = 2.46 mg/m at 25°C and one atmosphere pressure.

An iF of 10 ppm (i.e., 10 5) means that an exposed population inhales an aggregate increment of 10 grams per tonne emitted.

The simulation results show that the PPM-I produced 90.2% reliability of the CSP.

The PPM captured all the malicious attempts in an ideal case (PPM-I) and provided a success-rate reaching 100%.

The effectiveness of the CSP in the expected case was the reconfirmation that the PPM-E was not entirely approaching the theoretical maximum of the PPM-I.

Based on the number of auditing, the CSP will be able to maintain approximately 90.2% reliability for PPM-I, as shown in Fig. 12.

The simulation results exhibit this by increasing the number of CUs which decreases the operational efficiency for all three cases (i.e., PPM-I, PPM-E, and PPM-W), as shown in Fig. 10.