"Potential misleading" is a grammatically correct phrase, but it may not sound natural to a native English speaker.
It is more common to use the phrase "potentially misleading" instead. This phrase is typically used to indicate that something could be misleading, but it is not necessarily always misleading. Example: The study's results were potentially misleading, as the sample size was quite small and may not accurately represent the entire population.
Meanwhile, no false-positive result was found on either HEK-293T cells (EGFR-unexpressed) or A549 cells (no EGFR mutation), excluding potential misleading while performing targeted therapy.
12.00 13.00 To evaluate breast tumours in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers (BRCA-MC) using MRI in order to detect potential misleading characteristics more frequently present in this group.
However, when analysing the data that are collected on geographic areas, the spatial effects are seldom considered, which could lead to potential misleading analytical results.
To eliminate the potential misleading influence of these sequences, which may be under selection due to the requirement for complementarity between miRNAs and their targets, on the similarity test, each foldback arm with hits (E<0.05) in the FASTA search was analyzed independently with and without the miRNA or miRNA-complementary sequences.
Our study is far from being the first study to show the potential misleading nature of spicules and to question their utility in sponge taxonomy [22], [110], [111], [112], especially with the numerous studies on the phenotypical plasticity of spicules (e.g. [113]) and the recent outburst of cryptic species identification [114], [115], [116].
Thus, high copy numbers for these nuclear segments can produce potential misleading heteroplasmic signals.
An additional drawback to consider with the use of cpSSRs is the potential for misleading patterns due to cytoplasmic introgression.
The potential for misleading information makes it undesirable to interpret a covariate effect on a minor risk.
Simultaneously, using large numbers of markers has also increased concerns about false positives [ 8- 11] and the potential for misleading results in follow-up re-sequencing studies.
5 Drawbacks associated with IOPTH use include the cost of the assay, operating room (OR) time associated with waiting for results, and the potential for misleading the surgeon into performing unnecessary further exploration (false negatives).
Because signal is accounted for in the Townsend [ 5] informativeness but the potential for misleading homoplasy is not, greater homoplasy in DNA sequences might have led to worse predictions for DNA markers than for amino acid markers.
