Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
There is a potential for review bias owing to a lack of blinding between the test and reference standard.
Nonetheless, there are two principal limitations relating to the quality of the reference standard (a single radiologist's opinion) and a lack of blinding between the test and the reference standard, raising the potential for review bias.
Similar(57)
Site study staff identified potential charts for review according to study inclusion and exclusion criteria and contacted subjects of the potential charts to obtain written informed consent prior to data abstraction.
The Idea Battlefield will allow individuals and teams across the company to submit their potential products for review by a judging panel, with the best submissions going on to a finalist round to pitch their ideas.
We queried the PubMed database to obtain an initial list of potential articles for review.
Further abstract analysis identified 11 of these as potential candidates for review.
We identified 3,073 potential papers for review, of which 44 were included in this study.
The output comprises a short list of organisms with potential outbreaks for review, ranked according to an exceedance score that measures the degree of statistical aberrance.
In support of this, both the IKto- and delayed rectifier currents are reduced in ventricular cardiomyocytes from type 1 diabetic rats resulting in action potential prolongation (For review see [ 4]).
Our searches identified 3,073 potential papers for review, of which 1,105 papers were screened in accordance with our predetermined cap of 200 papers per database (Global Health, PAIS, PsycINFO and Social Services each produced less than 200 references).
However, the lead author (CJC) did conduct a search of PubMed articles available as of April 2015, reviewed citation lists from the retrieved review articles [ 77– 79] and further reviewed abstracts and presentations at pertinent international scientific meetings (e.g. IDWeek) in order to identify potential studies for review.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com