Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(26)
Frontal alpha (post p < 0.01, post15 p < 0.001) and beta activity (post15 p < 0.001) increased after AG compared to a decrease in frontal alpha (post15 p < 0.05) and beta activity (post p < 0.01) after exercise.
Mean REE significantly increased more with HIIT compared to AEE from baseline to IP exercise (p < 0.001), 30 min post (p = 0.002), and 60 min post (p = 0.002); (Additional file 1: Appendix 1 and Figure 2A).
Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc analysis performed with *p < 0.05 pre- vs post #p < 0.05 vs treatment.
Two-way analysis of variance revealed the use of a fiber post (p = 0.007) and the type of crown (p < 0.001) significantly affected the restorability of fractured teeth.
Plasma concentrations of both IL-6 and hepcidin significantly increased post-exercise following both trials (p < .05) and returned to baseline by 24 h post (p > .05).05
For post designs, the tapered posts introduced significantly higher stress compared with the parallel-sided post (p < 0.05), especially along the centre of the post.
Similar(34)
Furthermore, pre and post P-gp-blocking cerebral [11C]flumazenil concentrations were compared in all animals (pharmacological inhibition model).
Fifty bovine teeth (n = 10 per group) with standard dimensions were restored as follows: cast post and core (CPC), prefabricated metallic post (PFM), parallel glass-fiber post (P-FP), conical glass-fiber post (C-FP) or composite core (no post, CC).
Of the materials, the highest level of stress was found for stainless steel, followed by zirconia, titanium, glass fibre and carbon fibre posts (p < 0.05).
Crucially, the map-volume after nonuse in AO was similar to that recorded before immobilization in the 3 groups (ND-Pre vs. AO-Post: P = 0.38; MI-Pre vs. AO-Post: P = 0.12; AO-Pre vs. AO-Post: P = 0.13).
Indeed, the map-volume measured after nonuse in ND and MI was significantly smaller than the one obtained in the same condition (Post) in the AO (ND-Post vs. AO-Post: P = 0.012; MI-Post vs. AO-Post: P = 0.007).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com