Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
The survey was limited in that it was not conducted by professional interviewers, where, two teams were deployed for the interviews and interviews were conducted in both Khmer and English languages; as such, it was not possible to completely rule out the possibility of interviewer bias.
Though efforts were made to carry out interviews in a neutral unbiased manner, the possibility of interviewer bias cannot be ruled out.
Nevertheless, all patient data will be obtained from self-report questionnaires, in order to exclude the possibility of interviewer bias.
The possibility of interviewer bias such as unintentional errors resulting from interviewers omitting questions or misunderstanding respondents is acknowledged.
The possibility of interviewer bias could not be completely eliminated as some subjects were not literate (6%) and hence the research officer had to fill the questionnaire.
By using local research assistants, who were familiar with the language of the participants, the authors tried to reduce the possibility of interviewer bias.
Similar(54)
The questionnaires were fairly extensive, studying multiple hypotheses, which reduced the possibility of interviewers' focusing on a certain hypothesis.
In addition, LS is a member of the community, and having worked with the health department, there are possibilities of interviewer biases.
For these reasons, possibility of an interviewer effect was minimal.
This classification strategy was utilized in order to decrease the possibility of bias since the interviewer, patient, investigator, and physician were unaware of the disease diagnosis at the time of interview.
The Cosden study also reported on the possibility of outcome bias, as the interviewer was not blind to the outcome condition of the participant, and loss to follow-up (25%% of the study sample were lost to follow-up) at 12 months (Cosden et al. (2003).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com