Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
If the opportunity costs are larger than the revenue from allocating m k to k = 1 (i.e. a positive test outcome), the OPMA will serve k to the extent permitted by the remaining endowment.
In 178 patients, changes were more significant during the first 5 min in HR, systolic AP (SAP), and differential AP for patients with positive test outcome (diastolic AP--DAP--did not change significantly), providing a set of results ranges for different analysis: 68-55% specificity, and 53-72% sensitivity.
We referred all individuals with a positive test outcome to staff nurses from Bwindi Community Hospital.
For a specificity of 90%%, the cut-off value for a positive test outcome was a probability for positive deep pelvic nodes of 32%% or more.
It is common that regression shows statistical significance while positive EPV does not show that a positive test outcome is clinically relevant.
The specificity of a test is the reliability with which a positive test outcome indicates the presence of an underlying condition.
Our analysis demonstrates that given a screening schedule (ie, age range and screening interval), two-sample FIT strategies with the mean from both test results being positive or at least one positive test outcome provide more LYG at acceptable costs than one-sample FIT screening.
The two-sample FIT screening strategies with the mean from both test results being positive or at least one positive test outcome were therefore ruled out by extended dominance and were considered not to be cost-effective compared with one-sample FIT screening.
We looked at the impact of other factors such as sex, BMI, TB contact history, education level of participants' families and family size of participants on acquisition of M. tuberculosis infection as assessed by TST or QFT-GIT and no apparent association was observed between these factors and a positive test outcome.
Incorrect mappings can result in false positive test outcomes.
We estimated parasitemia prevalence by dividing the number of positive test outcomes by the number of tests administered, assuming that all individuals to be at risk for infection.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com