Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

positive for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "positive for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in medical or testing contexts to indicate that a test result shows the presence of a particular condition or substance. Example: "The patient tested positive for the flu virus."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

"It's positive for gold".

News & Media

The New York Times

It's positive for her.

News & Media

The New York Times

That's very positive for us".

News & Media

Independent

It was positive for Ebola.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It's a positive for us.

She tested positive for Ebola.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It was positive for me.

News & Media

The New Yorker

She tested positive for H.I.V.

Both tested positive for DMAA.

"It's not positive for stocks".

News & Media

The New York Times

I'm very positive for once.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing medical test results, use "positive for" to clearly indicate the presence of a specific condition or substance. For example, "The sample tested "positive for" antibodies."

Common error

Avoid assuming "positive for" always implies a desirable outcome. In medical contexts, it often indicates the presence of a disease or unwanted substance. Ensure the context makes it clear whether the positive result is beneficial or detrimental.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "positive for" functions as a predicate adjective, describing the subject's state or condition with respect to a specific test or evaluation. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's frequently used to indicate a test result.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Science

19%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "positive for" is a versatile term commonly used to report a finding, often in medical or testing contexts. As Ludwig AI indicates, it correctly describes the state or condition in a particular test. While it's grammatically sound and appears frequently across various sources, the implications of testing "positive for" something can vary greatly depending on the context. Therefore, it's essential to consider the broader scenario when interpreting results. It is a common phrase found in "News & Media", "Science" and "Formal & Business"

FAQs

How is "positive for" typically used in medical contexts?

In medicine, "positive for" indicates the presence of a specific substance, condition, or disease. For example, a patient might test "positive for" a virus, meaning the virus was detected in their system.

What are some situations where being "positive for" something is not desirable?

In medical testing, being "positive for" a disease like Ebola or HIV indicates infection. In drug testing, it indicates the presence of prohibited substances. Therefore, context is crucial in understanding the implications.

Are there alternatives to "positive for" that maintain a similar meaning?

Yes, depending on the context, you can use phrases like "indicates the presence of" or "shows a positive result for". However, "positive for" is often the most direct and widely understood option.

What's the difference between "tested positive for" and "tested negative for"?

"Tested positive for" means a test identified the presence of something, while "tested negative for" means the test did not detect that specific substance or condition. Both are used in medical and other testing scenarios.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: