The largest portion of variance was explained when Titus et al. (2008) [31] was removed (R2 = 0.9202).
A significant portion of variance was explained by differences among samples within groups (wild, captive-spawned, captive-reared) and among samples irrespective of groups (ΦSC = 0.0558, P < 0.0001; ΦST = 0.0052, P < 0.0001) but not among groups (ΦCT = −0.0037, P = 0.1359).
A small but significant portion of variance was explained by differences among wild, captive-spawned, and captive-reared samples (FCT = 0.00052, P = 0.007).
The portion of variance explained by personality was similar to, and sometimes larger than, that explained by competencies.
Figure 4 displays the portion of variance explained by predicted and residual values for condition.
The portion of variance explained by the residual value ranges from 91.4% for diabetes to 95.4% for sleep apnea.
The method assumes that the portion of variance explained in l-ascorbic acid by rs33972313 is independent of other factors, and therefore, the genetic variant provides an unconfounded instrument for l-ascorbic acid that is not susceptible to reverse causation.
The nearest gene is reported, along with partial R, the portion of variance explained by MAGWAS across the concentrations after considering covariates.
These facets independently explained a proportion of the variance that was not explained by the others.
Where indicated, the portion of the variance explained by the model tested is given by the Adjusted R square (Adj R).
Also in the case of educational attainment and participation in continuing education, a greater portion of the variance was explained by the competencies than by the personality dimensions.
