Differences in flowering phenology between sources and populations remained significant in the F2 garden (Tables 1C and 2).
However, we detect a high percentage of significant outcomes according to Tajima's D, including 3 populations remaining significant after correction for multiple tests.
Post hoc analysis using a Bonferroni correction for the repeated ANOVA test show that differences between populations remain significant, except for two homogenous groups from Central South Asia: Pathan, Burusho and Brahui on the one hand; and Mozabite, Balochi and Makrani on the other.
When we applied partial correlation to remove the effect of foreknowledge (i.e., proportion of respondents who marked the particular species as known), the relationship between mean scores and zoo population size remained significant (r2 = 13.7%, p = 0.021).
At the end of this procedure, population size remained significant for all studied estimators of genetic variability.
In the period immediately after the war, the African American population declined but remained significant at about 16,000.
This was not observed within our population, and glaucoma remained significant after adjustment utilising baseline data.
We also found a significant correlation between RF difference and genetic distance among populations and this remained significant when we controlled for the effect of geographic distance (Partial Mantel Test: R 2 = 0.075, P < 0.001).
Parity more than 3 was shown as risk factor in both populations and it remained significant (P < 0.05) after age, height and weight adjustment in Iranian subjects (table 2).
Testing HWE for individual populations and loci revealed that this disequilibrium remained significant within populations (all populations at locus Cma11EPA, Tejo, Sado and Minho populations for locus SP251 and Tejo and Aveiro populations for locus Cma10EPA).
