There is evidence from both microbial [ 68] and cancer cell populations (discussed below) that drug treatments can reduce heterogeneity of a population when they are naive to the drug.
A major challenge in addressing these questions is that the precise identification of individual nucleosomes is rendered complex by current assays which (i) are biased and (ii) sample nucleosomes positions across a cell population, as discussed below, raising the need for nucleosome calling methods that account for both issues.
Differences in the prevalence of the different risk factors for peptic ulcer complications between populations, which will be discussed below, are other possible explanations.
If the Equatorial region is a contact zone between partially isolated NEPR and SEPR populations, this too could produce differentiation that resembles the product of stepping-stone dispersal, but this hypothesis fails to explain the low gene diversity in SEPR populations of R. pachyptila (discussed below).
For reasons that will be discussed below, the population of the K63-Ub2 clostatetate is about 70%.
It is possible that the heterogeneous patient population and methodological limitations further discussed below, might have affected the results of the analyses.
Surveys have been widely used in community-based research projects, including both general population surveys and surveys of particular population groups, such as college students (discussed below in Community Indicators on Alcohol and Alcohol-Related Harm; see also the table).
Unexpected and unpublished expression patterns were also noted, particularly the expression of many PRL/PL genes in the developing ectoplacental cone (see below) and the segregation of certain family members to the spongiotrophoblast or glycogen cell populations within the junctional zone (discussed below).
We assume that this phenomenon is most probably connected with the specific observed changes in dietary patterns, alcohol consumption, and tobacco smoking in the Polish population, although of course other factors (discussed below) may also have contributed.
7– 11 Discussed below is a brief summary of the setting, population and sample.
