poorly supported document

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "poorly supported document" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a document that lacks sufficient evidence, references, or backing to substantiate its claims or arguments. Example: "The report was dismissed by the committee due to being a poorly supported document that failed to provide adequate data."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

The tone is rasping, thin and, in general, poorly supported.

The New York Times - Arts

The essay was cryptic and poorly supported by empirical evidence.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Which then translates into the project being poorly supported.

Huffington Post

Clade 1 was poorly supported (bootstrap<50).

Plosone

Other differences are poorly supported in both results.

Plosone

Subtypes 2b and 2i also formed clusters, although poorly supported.

Plosone

However, this branch is poorly supported.

Genome Biology and Evolution

Correspondingly, clades above the species level were often poorly supported.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Instead, archaeal species formed a poorly supported clade.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

The remaining factors were poorly supported by the data.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Although poorly supported, chordate and protostome sequences form separate groups.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When criticizing a document as "poorly supported", specify which claims lack adequate evidence and suggest potential sources for stronger support.

Common error

While "poorly supported" implies a deficiency, avoid exaggerating the issue by claiming the document is completely devoid of support unless that is demonstrably true. Qualify your criticism appropriately.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "poorly supported document" functions as a noun phrase, where "poorly supported" acts as an adjective modifying the noun "document". According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is considered correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

25%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "poorly supported document" is used to describe a document lacking adequate evidence or justification. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in English. While examples are limited, the phrase appears across various domains like Science, News & Media, and Encyclopedias, suggesting a versatile application. When using this phrase, ensure you can clearly articulate the specific shortcomings of the document's supporting evidence. Related phrases include "weakly substantiated document" and "inadequately evidenced document".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

weakly substantiated document

Focuses on the insufficient evidence provided to back up the claims within the document.

inadequately evidenced document

Highlights the lack of proper evidence to support the document's contents.

unsubstantiated document

Emphasizes that the document's claims have not been proven or validated.

poorly evidenced document

Similar to "inadequately evidenced document", but more concise.

poorly validated document

Focuses on the lack of validation or confirmation of the document's accuracy.

insufficiently backed document

Highlights the lack of sufficient backing or support for the document's claims.

document lacking support

A more direct and literal way of saying that the document doesn't have much backing.

tenuously supported document

Indicates that the document's support is weak and easily challenged.

document with weak foundations

Emphasizes the lack of a solid base or foundation for the document's arguments.

flimsily supported document

Suggests that the document's support is weak, insubstantial and easily broken.

FAQs

How can I identify a "poorly supported document"?

Look for a lack of citations, weak or irrelevant evidence, logical fallacies, and claims that are not substantiated by credible sources. A "well-supported document", conversely, will have strong evidence and clear reasoning.

What are the consequences of relying on a "poorly supported document"?

Relying on a "poorly supported document" can lead to incorrect conclusions, flawed decision-making, and damage to your credibility. Always verify the information from multiple, reliable sources.

What can I say instead of "poorly supported document"?

You can use alternatives like "weakly substantiated document", "inadequately evidenced document", or "unsubstantiated document", depending on the specific context.

What's the difference between a "poorly supported document" and a "well-researched document"?

A "poorly supported document" lacks sufficient evidence and credible sources to back its claims, while a "well-researched document" is based on thorough investigation and provides ample evidence to support its arguments.