Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Scientists have generally responded that these arguments are poorly supported by existing evidence.
The tone is rasping, thin and, in general, poorly supported.
The essay was cryptic and poorly supported by empirical evidence.
Which then translates into the project being poorly supported.
Clade 1 was poorly supported (bootstrap<50).
Other differences are poorly supported in both results.
Subtypes 2b and 2i also formed clusters, although poorly supported.
However, this branch is poorly supported.
The differing predictive outcome from a gene-based model also supports arguments that inclusive fitness formulations poorly model some evolutionary questions.
For supporting arguments, see Dretske (2004, 2007).
List supporting arguments.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com