In line with previous studies, we defined CKD using administrative coding (see Additional file 2 for codes), which is highly specific but poorly sensitive (median sensitivity 41%; median specificity 98%) [ 4, 11].
As an alternative, we could only describe CKD using administrative coding, which is highly specific but poorly sensitive (median sensitivity 41%; median specificity 98%) [ 36], and by the surrogate of prior visits with a nephrologist which is an important shortcoming.
Pure graphene is poorly sensitive to hydrogen, but incorporation of PdNPs increases its sensitivity by more than an order of magnitude.
IEI-EMF is a poorly defined sensitivity.
In the acute phase, all three methods performed poorly with sensitivities of 50.0, 52.7 and 38.5% respectively.
Two variants of the wetcat package, C4.5 and C4.5 with p8-p12, performed most poorly with sensitivities of 40%, consistent with previous observations on both subtype B and non-B subtypes [ 46, 47, 49].
PatternHunter [ 8] (Table 1) performed poorly, with high sensitivity, but very low specificity.
However, this model performed poorly, with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 50% (Table 3).
Days with delirium were poorly recognized by doctors (sensitivity = 29.8%; specificity = 99.7%; PPV = 99.6%) and ICU nurses (sensitivity = 35.6%; specificity = 97.8%; PPV = 84%).
Question: paulja 28 February 2012 3 46PM Dear Mike, Why, when the IPCC acknowledges that the effects of clouds and water vapour on climate sensitivity are poorly understood, do all GCMs assume strong positive feedback?
