Exact(2)
Aged subjects with normal hearing have poorer intensity discrimination for low-frequency tones measured behaviorally, which would predict poorer AMFRs for low-frequency carriers.
When measured behaviorally, older adults with normal hearing have poorer intensity discrimination thresholds than younger adults, but only at lower frequencies.
Similar(58)
The peaks below 18 s were considered as suboptimal as they displayed poor intensity.
Low counts in SPECT can result in poor intensity resolution (color banding) and in the disappearance of some image parts.
Poor intensity discrimination at lower but not higher frequencies for older adults can be associated with an age-related decline in temporal processing.
A highest intensity of 3.4 would mean that there will only be four distinguished colors (0, 1, 2, 3) in the integer format stored image resulting in color banding due to poor intensity quantization.
Features of poor intensity (<500) and those which did not meet the quality control criteria (visual inspection, spot circularity, spot uniformity and background uniformity for both channels) were discarded.
This will lead to poor intensity estimates unless the proportion of the specular to 2θB peak intensities remains constant.
Exceptions are classically those where high background, poor intensity, or non-contrasting staining occurs; however, these types of limitations also present similar problems with the visual scale, or any other current methods of quantitation.
In the latter, defects with osteogenic insufficiency are determined by poor intensity of osteogenesis, and, accordingly, they require not optimization but rather induction and maintenance of reparative processes on a high level that may be achieved by introducing additional growth factors, substances increasing their synthesis, or cells that are able to produce them.
Violations of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) assumptions can indicate poor clustering, which may also reflect poor quality intensity data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com