Sentence examples for poor score for from inspiring English sources

The report's authors drew attention to the poor score for several technology giants, including Amazon and Google.

The country also has a very poor score for rates of communicable diseases and health indicators in general.Mauritius, the second-highest-ranked Sub-Saharan economy, also scores poorly on university education and labour markets.

This led to a fair to poor score for the quality of these measurement properties and generalisability.

The variables for which there was an association with more than one of the reported illnesses were age, and a poor score for evidence of pests and vermin in the house (skin infection and scabies).

Similarly, if the model predicts a pair of output spikes for every single output spike of the neuron, again, the two spike trains would carry almost exactly the same amount of information, but the GCF will give a rather poor score for the performance of the model (because only ∼50% of the spikes are predicted).

It could be argued that measures such as cleaning and disinfection of stables and compartments, implemented by 78%, and a mean sanitary period of 5.33 days between batches, in 92% of herds, are at least as important for biosecurity as are foot baths and that the poor score for the subcategory is not of major concern.

Both surveys showed poor scores for models with MyFord Touch.

But this risk was already captured in poor scores for political indicators for both these countries.

Indeed American cities tend not to do as well as their Australian and Canadian counterparts because poor scores for crime and congestion negate their decent marks for culture.

Even double-barrelled Craig, Mr Nasty on the BBC's Strictly Come Dancing, would struggle to award poor scores for race quality and location; but, equally, nice old Len couldn't possibly avoid sharpening his sometimes barely visible claws when judging the facilities.

Seven of the top ten scoring cities are in Australia and Canada, where population densities of 2.88 and 3.40 people per sq km respectively compare with a global (land) average of 45.65 and a US average of 32.At the other end of the ranking, Harare, the capital of Zimbabwe, is in 140th place, thanks to particularly poor scores for its stability, health care and infrastructure.