Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
The proposed problem scores or scales, with the exception of closure and advance care planning, demonstrated a moderate correlation (i.e., from 0.44 to 0.52) with the overall rating of satisfaction (as measured by a five-point, "excellent" to "poor" scale).
A poor scale would generate severe errors in dosing (3, 4).
Second, poor scale reliability can attenuate the correlation between two variables.
The respondents reported their general health to be in the mid-range of the excellent to poor scale.
Physical health was self-rated using the 5-point "excellent," "very good," "good," "fair," or "poor" scale.
Items were deleted for several reasons [i.e. highly skewed distribution, high inter-correlations (of >0.80 among item set), poor scale coherence, interpretive issues].
Similar(53)
It has been reported that the line search in conjugate gradient method performs more function evaluations so as to obtain a desirable steplength (alpha_{k}) due to poor scaling of the search direction (see Nocedal [20]).
Due to the poor scaling of these eigenfunctions for extreme arguments and/or orders, direct numerical evaluation of such expressions can produce numerical instability, i.e., underflow, overflow, and/or round-off errors under finite precision arithmetic.
However, with a need for higher current, and more compact, sources up to and over 1 A, monolithic sources begin to suffer from the poor scaling of source area to current.
The technique, termed "multiple replica repulsion" (MRR), does not suffer from poor scaling with the number of degrees of freedom associated with common replica exchange procedures and does not require sampling at high temperatures.
However, this strategy is severely limited by the poor scaling of conventional QM approaches.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com