Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
This suggests poor reporting quality of trials in blood conservation.
Poor reporting diminishes the value of otherwise good studies.
Poor reporting arguably limits the extent to which PRO data can inform clinical practice.
Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results.
He cites both, "poor reporting" and "deliberate misinformation".
Poor reporting on loan accounts to the national credit bureaus.
Poor reporting practices delayed detection (outbreak 9).
Poor reporting of causes of death was a problem in the UK in the 1990s [ 29].
These observations demonstrate the "poor reporting quality" problem, which is described below.
Poor reporting in cross-over trials was also underscored by Elbourne et al. [ 7].
Findings relating to other outcomes were hampered by a lack of robust evidence and poor reporting.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com