Sentence examples for poor rankings from inspiring English sources

Conversely, the lower-right panel shows a proposal that began with poor rankings but settled at with the best ranking after 25 reviewers.

I asked the firms with particularly poor rankings for comments, and most of them responded, generally with quite similar statements.

Those numbers would be even better if not for a pair of poor rankings associated with V.C.U.

Few politicians who speak about education these days forget to lament the country's poor rankings in international league tables, or the urgent need to produce more college graduates.

However, the researchers attributed the gap to the shaming effect of poor rankings on teachers and governors, rather than parental choices.Other evidence supports the idea that embarrassing practitioners in the eyes of their colleagues works.

It is a shame you were not able to forecast sooner the collapse in our economy despite the abundant signs: an extreme dependency on construction and tourism, very low productivity, poor rankings in education on every international indicator, a stiff labour market, obstacles to starting a business, the end of the flood of money from Brussels, etc.

Mid-tier firms less familiar with the world of social responsibility scrutiny felt ambushed, marked down for not providing information about their human rights policy or strategy to manage future environmental risks, which bigger companies would do routinely, and then suddenly finding their poor ranking splashed on the national news.

Green Bay entered Sunday's game ranked 31st over all and 31st against the pass, with the run defense ranked 12th in large part because the Packers are usually in the lead and opponents have to abandon the run to stay in the game — which in turn bloats the passing numbers, making the poor ranking seem slightly worse than it really is.

This poor ranking for Health Advocate is in alignment with the work of others who suggest this role as being one of the most difficult to teach and evaluate [ 5, 6].

At each iteration, we only eliminate a fraction (1% in many cases) of the poor ranking variables, giving the remaining variables a chance to increase the performance at later iterations.

Applicants with the highest ISC scores (corresponding to poorer rankings) were more likely to perform poorly clinically, as illustrated by a greater degree of clustering of scores in that range.