Exact(1)
Several studies, by contrast, had very poor probabilities of false negatives; Obermayr et al. [ 27], Helleman et al. [ 53] and Gevaert et al. [ 49] all have P(Condition+|Test−)>0.5, which suggests that these models give a false negative more often than a random assignment.
Similar(59)
Under the NP criterion, this very low (much lower than the tolerance level) value of the probability of false alarm is achieved at the cost of very poor probability of detection, as shown in Figure 11, which leads to significant underutilization of the available spectrum hole.
It is well-known, however, that humans are poor probability estimators [ 2] and that physicians are no exception [ 3, 4].
Moreover, the presence of HS or of CPs was associated with a poor probability of sustained MDA at the 24-month follow-up.
Eighteen patients were previously treated with ESA+G-CSF without achieving TI, remaining patients had poor probability of response according to the predictive model and were considered refractory upfront.
However, it is important to note that most studies [ 28- 31] demonstrated a poor probability of target attainment for the levofloxacin 500 mg QD regimen when MICs are 1 mcg/ml or more.
Tumours with high EF had a significantly poorer probability of DFS than those with low EF (P=0.011).
A similar pattern was observed for DCC methylation and RPFT, although with DCC, it was Q1 had much poorer probability of recurrence/persistence compared to other quartiles (p-value = 0.002).
In particular, a paradox with regard to the impact of the family structure has been described: dialysis patients with a strong family structure have a poorer probability to survive than their less supported counterparts [ 24].
In parallel we observe very poor coverage probabilities under the Weibull approach.
We discovered that subgroups with an angio-index greater than 50 had substantially poor survival probabilities (P=0.001, 7.2 vs 26.2 months; Figure 4).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com