poor over

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "poor over" is not correct in English and does not convey a clear meaning.
It seems like it might be a typographical error or a misinterpretation of another phrase. Example: "I think you meant to say 'pour over' when referring to the method of brewing coffee."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Sport

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

The Jets' tackling was poor over all.

The New York Times - Sports

Harris survives a poor over pretty comfortably.

The Guardian - Sport

He starts with a poor over, too short again.

The Guardian - Sport

That was a truly poor over from Plunkett: all over the place.

The Guardian - Sport

"His form was pretty poor over 18 months, every other player just gets dropped.

The Guardian - Sport

Ten from a pretty poor over, and Broad whacks his cap on the ground in disgust.

The Guardian - Sport

Athers agrees: "poor over" he intones as yet another delivery passes harmlessly by the stumps.

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

In general, the agreement was poor, over-predicting the high Nusselt number data and under-predicting the low Nusselt number data, but capturing the mid-range quite well.

Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science

Why are they harassing these poor over-worked authors to write more?

Huffington Post

We don't need to be pestering this poor, over-burdened man with such petty things right now.

Huffington Post

In addition to the poor over-all prognosis the course of the disease is often complicated by thromboembolic events.

BMC Cancer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Carefully review your writing for potential typos, as "poor over" is often a misspelling of another phrase.

Common error

Avoid using "poor over" when you intend to use other phrasal verbs like "pour over" (meaning to study carefully) or when you mean to describe something as generally "poor" throughout a period.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "poor over" does not have a standard grammatical function in English. Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect and suggests it may be a typographical error. Its occurrences often appear in contexts where a different phrase was likely intended.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

35%

Sport

18%

Less common in

Academia

4%

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "poor over" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in English. Ludwig AI suggests that it often arises from typographical errors or misinterpretations. Although examples can be found across various sources, its usage is inconsistent and lacks a clear, defined meaning. When writing, it is advisable to consider alternative phrases such as "poor performance" or "poor quality" depending on the intended meaning. It is important to double-check writing for typos to avoid this error.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

poor performance

Emphasizes the substandard quality of execution or outcome.

poor quality

Focuses on the deficient standard or grade of something.

ineffective handling

Highlights the lack of success or skill in managing a situation or task.

inadequate coverage

Stresses the insufficiency of protection or attention provided.

deficient management

Points to the flawed administration or control of resources or operations.

lousy handling

Indicates a very poor or careless way of managing or dealing with something.

insufficient oversight

Highlights the lack of adequate supervision or monitoring.

pour over

Focuses on a different meaning, where something is poured onto or studied intently.

poor throughout

Highlights the inferior quality of something in general.

subpar performance

Indicates a performance that is below the expected standard.

FAQs

What does "poor over" mean?

The phrase "poor over" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It might be a typo, or a misunderstanding of other phrases like "pour over".

What can I say instead of "poor over" if I'm referring to something of low quality over a period of time?

Consider using "poor throughout" or "poor performance" depending on the context.

How to avoid mistaking "pour over" for "poor over"?

Be mindful of the context. "Pour over" implies a careful examination or the act of pouring something, while "poor" generally describes a lack of quality.

Is "poor over" ever correct?

It's rare, but possible if "poor" describes a state, and "over" is a preposition indicating location (e.g. "The blanket was poor over the shivering child"). However, this usage is uncommon and may sound awkward. Rephrasing is usually preferable.