Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
For example, several items from cognitive screening measures were shown to be poor items for those with low education levels [ 6].
Even if these severe symptoms are highly correlated with θ, they represent poor items for a screening test because they have a low base rate and do not provide information about where most people are.
Similar(58)
Poor items were revised or discarded when preliminary item analysis indicated they were too ambiguous or otherwise unsuitable for inclusion.
Such complex factor structures mean that the unidimensional Rasch model analyses would be likely to show poor fitting items for each scale of the questionnaire because they are multidimensional and, indeed, the IRT analyses showed this to be the case.
H values < 0.30 are considered to reflect a poor item and values for the scale as a whole are interpreted as follows: H values in the range 0.30 0.40 reflect a weak scale, 0.40 0.50 a medium scale and H > 0.50 reflects a strong scale.
Studies of the reasons for poor item performance that included qualitative techniques such as cognitive interviewing may have identified ways to reform problematic items or captured new concepts.
Another basic necessity that can go neglected when a family barely has the money to get food on the table, cleaning supplies -- especially larger items like vacuum cleaners -- are practical, much-needed gift items for poor families.
This leads to the poor accuracy about finding similar items for a query data point.
When we engage in this hierarchical categorization of items for which poor women exchange sex, we run the risk of misclassifying what they consider important needs as frivolous luxuries.
Woollams and colleagues (Woollams, 2012; Woollams et al., 2008) observed an appreciable typicality effect in picture-naming performance for people with semantic dementia, most significant for those at the moderate stage, demonstrating better-preserved naming for higher typicality items and poor performance for atypical items.
In general, few children were co-identified by parents and teachers as presenting with a particular symptom, and kappa values were generally poor for most items except for "Lacks best friend", "Lacks common sense", "Poor at games, own goals", and "Robotlike language", for which kappa values were fair to good (Table 4).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com