Throughout the history of industrialization, poor countries have started down the road of development by sewing clothes.
NEW YORK, 22 March 2010 – While almost 5.9 billion people or 87 per cent of the world's population now have access to an improved drinking water source, the risk of water pollution remains, often due to environmental factors such as increasing urbanization, industrialization and poor sanitation.
The Soviet type of planning grew up under the special conditions prevailing in the U.S.S.R. and was adapted to the task of speedy industrialization of a poor country, with strong emphasis on heavy industry, explicable partly by the logic of industrialization (steel and machinery are more conducive to industrial growth than textiles and jam), partly by concern for military potential.
Although the question is answered in part by explaining that the rich countries have experienced industrialization and the poor ones have not, the question remains why some have experienced industrialization and others have not).
Concerns about the impact of industrialization on the poor, the aged and the otherwise disenfranchised gave rise to the articulation and pursuit of the Social Gospel.
Urbanization encompasses several entities, including a high migration rate, industrialization, and urban poor.
His colleague and contemporary, James Phillips Kay, understood the wretched living conditions of the Manchester poor as the effect of industrialization and urbanization having severed the paternalistic relationship between the upper and lower orders, cutting the latter socially and morally adrift.
In others words, the same shock, in a much poorer country, although might promote industrialization for export activities, it would not necessarily lead to import substitution.
But it could also mean highlighting the plight of workers and the poor; documenting the disappearing countryside as industrialization swept through Europe and the United States; or demonstrating how painting related to the then-new medium of photography.
This is compatible, of course, with the existence of duties of justice as regards the benefits of industrialization and globalization; the poor may have become slightly better off, but the wealthy have undoubtedly gotten much, much richer, and we might develop theories that condemn this gap.
