poor evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "poor evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe evidence that is insufficient, weak, or lacking in quality to support a claim or argument. Example: "The researcher dismissed the findings, stating that they were based on poor evidence and did not warrant further investigation."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Poor evidence.

The Guardian

Targeting the Poor: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia.

Harvard University

"The careful analysis of bad data generates poor evidence".

The New York Times

Paper: "A multifaceted program causes lasting progress for the very poor: Evidence from six countries".

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The Potential of Urban Boarding Schools for the Poor: Evidence from SEED.

Harvard University

The Potential of Urban Boarding Schools for the Poor: Evidence from SEED | Roland G. Fryer, Jr. Fryer RG, Curto VE.

Harvard University

This is poor evidence for the accuracy of the document, as representatives of CLAR later pointed out.

The New Yorker

Mr. Jones added that the videotape was poor evidence because prosecutors had unfairly "laid a trap" for Mr. Vega.

The New York Times

A review of local therapies for RCC metastases in general revealed the poor evidence base for the treatment of bone metastases13.

Nature

Poor evidence contains a formidable break in the evidence chain such that the connection between the preventive service and health outcomes is uncertain.

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

In contrast, the previously described mGlu5 PAMs CDPPB and ADX47273 showed relatively poor evidence of in vivo target engagement in either receptor occupancy assays or EEG disturbance.

Neuropharmacology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "poor evidence", clearly explain why the evidence is considered poor. Specify if it's due to methodological flaws, small sample size, or biased data.

Common error

Avoid drawing definitive conclusions or making strong claims when the supporting evidence is acknowledged as "poor evidence". Instead, acknowledge the limitations and suggest further research.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "poor evidence" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "poor" modifies the noun "evidence". It describes the quality of the evidence presented. According to Ludwig, this phrase is perfectly usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "poor evidence" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote evidence that is weak, unreliable, or insufficient. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. It commonly appears in scientific, news, and academic contexts, serving to express skepticism or criticism about the strength of a claim. Alternatives include ""weak evidence"" or ""insufficient evidence"". When employing this phrase, ensure you articulate the specific shortcomings of the evidence and avoid overstating conclusions based on it. The phrase's prevalence across diverse sources underscores its importance in critical evaluation and clear communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

weak evidence

Replaces "poor" with "weak", indicating a lack of strength or robustness in the evidence.

insufficient evidence

Focuses on the quantity of evidence, suggesting there is not enough to support the claim.

limited evidence

Similar to "insufficient", but emphasizes the restricted scope or availability of evidence.

flimsy evidence

Suggests the evidence is easily discredited or does not hold up under scrutiny.

scant evidence

Highlights the minimal amount of evidence available.

tenuous evidence

Implies the evidence is fragile and easily challenged.

inadequate substantiation

Emphasizes the lack of proper support or confirmation for a claim.

unconvincing data

Focuses on the data's failure to persuade or provide strong support.

dubious proof

Highlights the questionable nature or reliability of the evidence.

unreliable information

Shifts the focus to the trustworthiness of the information presented as evidence.

FAQs

What does "poor evidence" mean?

"Poor evidence" refers to evidence that is weak, unreliable, or insufficient to support a claim or argument. It suggests that the evidence has significant flaws or limitations.

What are some synonyms for "poor evidence"?

Alternatives to "poor evidence" include "weak evidence", "insufficient evidence", "limited evidence", or "flimsy evidence", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

How does "poor evidence" affect the validity of a study?

"Poor evidence" undermines the validity of a study's conclusions. If the evidence is weak or unreliable, the study's findings may not be accurate or generalizable. Further research is usually needed.

In what contexts might I encounter "poor evidence"?

You might encounter "poor evidence" in various fields, including scientific research, legal proceedings, and policy debates, where the quality and reliability of supporting information are critical to support an argument.