Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(24)
However the correct histology may be suggested in the setting of lipoma (fat CT density), haemangioma (high T2-w signal and calcified phleboliths), chondrogenic tumours (high T2-w signal and 'popcorn' calcification), melanoma metastases (high T1-w signal), amyloidoma (low T1-w and T2-w signal with poor enhancement) and lymphoma (vividly enhancing bulky supraglottic mass)[ 29 ].
c Axial contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates relatively poor enhancement of the transverse colon (white arrows) relative to the hepatic and splenic flexures.
(d) Axial and (e) coronal contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted images demonstrate poor enhancement of the tumour wall and septa.
However, poor enhancement of the lesion on all the contrast-enhanced phases allows one to confidently differentiate between the two entities.
The most common CT/MR appearance of inflammatory pseudotumor is that of a peripherally enhancing mass with a central area of poor enhancement.
Poor enhancement of the graft's SMA is noted (arrowhead), together with non-enhancing arterial segments, suggesting occlusion.
Similar(36)
In addition, higher grade metallic surfaces showed poorer enhancements in catalysis which may relate to the extent of surface defects amenable to surface modification, as observed by electron microscopy.
Hepatobiliary phase showed slight enhance with poor contrast enhancement to spleen or vessels in non-neoplastic site.
In gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA -enhanced maGd-EOB-DTPA -enhancedinGd-EOB-DTPA -enhancedic site showed low siGd-EOB-DTPA -enhanced1b–e), and the non-neoplastic site was slightly enhanced on the hepatobiliary phase with poor contrast enhancemagneticspleen oresonance.
On (c) sagittal and (d) axial contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted images, the cyst wall shows poor contrast enhancement (white arrows) without vegetations, nodularity, or solid components.
It seemed that the acetone and water groups held poor SERS enhancement to GLC.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com