Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
We can say that air pollution is better, the rivers are cleaner, the water is being retained better and soil is being better conserved.
But carbon dioxide is odorless and colorless, so the eye is no judge of gauging when pollution is better or worse.
Reversing the effects of pollution is better still.
If you have an area where the light pollution is better or worse.
Similar(56)
But Chinese officials and analysts say he has since made clear that internal priorities — maintaining rapid economic growth and tamping down a wave of unrest over corruption, governmental land grabs, and severe pollution — are better served if Beijing cultivates cordial relations with Washington.
Certainly, heavy polluters are better off because they do not have to buy pollution permits or invest in new technology.
"Overall, estimating risk from air pollution is becoming more precise as the pathway from air pollution to health is better characterized," said C. Arden Pope, a Brigham Young University economist, at the roundtable.
"Gatwick is not a long-term solution and Howard Davies must explain to the people of London how he can possibly envisage that an expansion of Heathrow, which would create unbelievable levels of noise, blight and pollution, is a better idea than a new airport to the east of London that he himself admits is visionary".
UK car industry group the SMMT claims that, because of European legislation to cut tailpipe pollution, Britain's air quality is better now than it has been for centuries.
It is better to tax pollution than work or saving.The scheme is not particularly ambitious: quite a lot of the reductions it seeks, especially in the early years, will be bought from developing countries, using carbon permits generated by the United Nations Clean Development Mechanismm.
Background: Decision making regarding air pollution can be better informed if air quality impacts are traced back to individual emission sources.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com