points to make

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "points to make" is correct and usable in written English.
You could use this phrase to introduce a list of ideas in a sentence, such as "Here are a few points to make about the topic."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A few points to make.

The Economist

I have four points to make.

Independent

There are three points to make here.

The New York Times

He had three main points to make.

The Guardian

There are two points to make.

The Guardian - Opinion

Sting had other points to make.

The New York Times - Arts

Two points to make about that.

The Guardian - Opinion

But there are two points to make about this.

The Economist

(About which, she had some interesting points to make.

The Guardian

He also had some political points to make.

The New York Times - Arts

There are two points to make about them.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When introducing a list of items or ideas, use "points to make" to clearly signal to the audience that you are about to present a series of important considerations. This sets expectations and helps maintain focus.

Common error

While "points to make" is acceptable, avoid repetitive use in formal documents. Vary your language by using alternatives like "aspects to consider" or "factors to analyze" to maintain a professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "points to make" functions as a noun phrase, often used to introduce a list of arguments, ideas, or considerations. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable nature in English. Examples from Ludwig illustrate its use in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

56%

Science

27%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "points to make" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to introduce a list of ideas, arguments, or considerations. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's versatile, appearing in diverse contexts from news and media to scientific and formal business publications. While its register is generally neutral, more formal alternatives might be preferable in highly academic or professional settings. Remember to use it to signal key considerations clearly. The top sources for the phrase include The Guardian, The New York Times, and The Economist.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

things to consider

Focuses on aspects that require thought or attention.

aspects to discuss

Emphasizes elements that need to be talked about.

topics to cover

Indicates subjects that need to be included in a discussion or presentation.

issues to address

Highlights problems or concerns that need to be resolved.

ideas to present

Stresses innovative or thoughtful concepts that are shared.

concerns to raise

Implies bringing up worries or doubts that need to be acknowledged.

items to mention

Refers to specific details or facts that should be brought up.

arguments to advance

Focuses on justifications or reasons that are put forth to support a claim.

factors to analyze

Emphasizes the elements that need detailed examination.

observations to share

Highlights insights or findings that are communicated with others.

FAQs

How can I use "points to make" in a sentence?

You can use "points to make" to introduce a list of ideas or arguments, as in "There are several "things to consider" before making a decision, and here are the main "points to make"." Or you can say "He has some valid "points to make" about the issue".

What are some alternatives to "points to make"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "aspects to discuss", "issues to address", or "items to mention".

Is "points to make" formal or informal?

"Points to make" is generally acceptable in both formal and informal contexts, but it's essential to consider your audience and purpose. In very formal writing, using alternatives like "factors to analyze" or "arguments to advance" may be more appropriate.

How does "points to make" differ from "things to consider"?

"Points to make" suggests presenting specific arguments or ideas, while "things to consider" is more general, referring to aspects that require thought or attention. "Points to make" is slightly more assertive and direct.