"points put forward" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used in formal or academic writing to refer to ideas or arguments that have been presented or suggested. Here is an example sentence: "After conducting thorough research, the team summarized the findings and discussed the key points put forward by each member in the meeting."
By now, the government has published its legal position and I am unconvinced by the points put forward.
Judge Lord Stewart ruled in favour of the charity, calling the consents "defective", meaning ministers will have to reconsider the planning decisions and address the points put forward by the RSPB's lawyers.
Speaking after the meeting, interim chief executive, Jock Millican was happy with the outcomes, saying: "There were a lot of good points put forward with a lot of passion and a lot of constructive points for the good of the game.
Of course, I do not comment on critical points put forward by journalists who hold different moral and political values.
Daniel Loeb, founder of US hedge fund Third Point, put forward the idea in a letter to Sony president Kazuo Hirai.
Another point put forward is that the MacLeods did not adopt the royal names of the 13th century Manx dynasty names such as Godfrey (Old Norse: Guðrøðr; Gaelic: Gofraid), Ranald (Old Norse Rögnvaldr; Gaelic: Raghnall), Olaf (Old Norse Óláfr; Gaelic Amlaíb), and Harald (Old Norse Haraldr; Gaelic Aralt).
On this basis, according to the characteristic of PCR algorithm, traverse optimization method for selecting the optimum temperature measuring points is put forward as well.
The role of judges in cases like Julian Assange's appeal is to listen to the points being put forward by both sides and decide who has the best argument.
Several points were put forward in this chapter regarding the importance of proper design in the hardware/ firmware interface: to make sure firmware can halt, abort, or reset as needed, to collaborate with firmware during the abort process, and to notify firmware when the abort task is done.
By American standards, that might seem unusual, but earlier today the BBC's Dominic Casciani explained how Assange might force the court to reverse itself: The role of judges in cases like Julian Assange's appeal is to listen to the points being put forward by both sides and decide who has the best argument.
Similar points are put forward in Seoane and Williams 2006, where scientific discourse is contrasted with prescriptive legal discourse.
