Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase “points of failure” is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to refer to potential weaknesses or areas where something could go wrong. For example, “We identified several points of failure in the process that need to be addressed.”.
Exact(45)
When architecting solutions, avoid "single points of failure", including dependence on any single player.
Pantheon Database instances are always on a separate server than appservers, in order to reduce single points of failure.
I'm still amazed at how accurately this system can be executed considering how many possible points of failure there are.
This is achieved through the elimination of hardware and software single points of failure (SPOF).
With those multiple tiers come multiple points of failure that could be abused, leading to massive privacy breaches.
The setback was a classic example of the problems that can follow when complex systems have single points of failure.
Similar(14)
The LOCKSS research team has also identified a taxonomy of potential single-points-of-failure (highly correlated risks), that at minimum, a trustworthy preservation system should mitigate against.
"We don't have a single point of failure.
Widen the input circle beyond a single point of failure.
Such architecture may have single-point of failure problem.
A drawback of client/server systems is that the server is a single point of failure.
More suggestions(16)
observations of failure
conditions of failure
index of failure
location of failure
points of earmark
points of differentiation
points of weakness
points of similarity
points of comparison
points of distribution
points of campness
points of strangeness
points of contention
points of agreement
points of order
points of view
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com