points of argument

USAGE SUMMARY

"points of argument" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it whenever you are needing to refer to different ideas that support a particular position or opinion. For example, "He argued his case by presenting three points of argument."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

"What purpose does it serve to have actors recreate these incidents when we already have such strong photographic proof?" Of course one of Mr. Morris's main points of argument is that "photographic proof" can be nothing of the kind.

The New York Times

Pico's other works include an exposition of Genesis under the title Heptaplus (Greek hepta, "seven"), indicating his seven points of argument, and a synoptic treatment of Plato and Aristotle, of which the completed work De ente et uno (Of Being and Unity) is a portion.

Encyclopedia Britannica

We should be past these points of argument.

Huffington Post

Strike up conversations about things in which you can contribute valid points of argument or information.

WikiHow

There are certain areas of your policies that can be points of argument between you and the insurer.

WikiHow

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

Zalman Shoval, a senior foreign policy adviser to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, used the two attacks as a point of argument against the communiqué issued at the United Nations on Tuesday by Secretary of State Colin L. Powell; the United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan; Russian Foreign Minister Igor S. Ivanov, and senior representatives of the European Union.

The New York Times

The perceived threat of ontological naturalism is also a major point of argument between intelligent design advocates and evolutionists.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

However, times of earthquakes are precisely dated in historical documents, but the assignment of the events as a Kanto recurrent earthquake is the point of argument.

Earth, Planets and Space

We set a price — let's say for the point of argument $14.99.

Huffington Post

While this was already a point of argument between politicians, the terror attacks in Paris only strengthened some stances.

Los Angeles Times

This process did not catalyze the music into saying something new; it did not combine or develop these themes toward a final point of argument as in European compositions.

Wikipedia

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When constructing an argument, clearly outline your "points of argument" to ensure clarity and logical flow for your audience.

Common error

Avoid presenting "points of argument" that overlap significantly, as this can weaken your overall case. Ensure each point offers a distinct perspective or evidence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "points of argument" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It refers to the specific ideas or reasons that are presented to support a particular stance or conclusion, as seen in the Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Wiki

33%

Science

17%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "points of argument" is a grammatically sound and neutrally-toned phrase used to refer to the reasons or ideas presented in support of a particular position. As indicated by Ludwig AI, it's appropriate for various contexts, although most frequently seen in news and media, wiki and scientific sources. When using this phrase, be sure that each point is clearly articulated and offers a distinct contribution to the overall argument. Consider alternatives such as "central arguments" or "key points of discussion" to add variety to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

argumentative points

Reverses the order of the words for a slightly different emphasis.

central arguments

Focuses on the core or most important arguments.

main points of contention

Highlights the controversial aspects of the arguments.

key points of discussion

Emphasizes the important elements in a debate.

major arguments

Highlights the significance of the arguments.

supporting arguments

Focuses on arguments used to support a particular position.

controversial issues

Shifts the focus to the issues that are being argued.

disputed matters

Emphasizes the contested nature of the points.

bones of contention

Uses an idiomatic expression to describe the cause of the argument.

debatable issues

Focuses on the issues that are open to debate.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "points of argument" in a presentation?

Clearly define your "points of argument" at the beginning, support each with evidence, and summarize them at the end. This structure enhances clarity and persuasiveness.

What are some alternatives to saying "points of argument"?

You can use alternatives like "central arguments", "key points of discussion", or "main points of contention" depending on the context.

Is it better to have many "points of argument" or just a few strong ones?

It's generally more effective to have a few strong "points of argument" that are well-supported, rather than many weak ones that dilute your message.

How do I identify the strongest "points of argument" in a debate?

Assess each potential point based on its relevance to the topic, the strength of available evidence, and its potential impact on the audience.