Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
When parents focus on the process of learning over the relatively arbitrary end product of points, grades and scores, we communicate in terms louder than words that we love our children unequivocally and without reservation.
The Elston-Ellis modified Scarff-Bloom-Richardson method, which categorizes tumors into low (3 to 5 points), intermediate (6 or 7 points), and high (8 or 9 points) grades, is currently the preferred method because it is relatively simple, reproducible, and has the ability to identify tumors with significantly different prognosis [ 5- 7].
Similar(58)
The total MIDAS score can be used to grade migraine-related disability [grade 1 (minimal disability): 1 5 points, grade 2 (mild): 6 10 points, grade 3 (moderate): 11 20 points, grade 4 (severe): >20 points] [28].
The Nottingham method, outlined in Table 1, is the most widely used method and overall grade is assigned as follows: Grade 1 - well differentiated - 3 5 points, Grade 2 - moderately differentiated - 6 7 points, Grade 3 - poorly differentiated - 8 9 points.
Evaluation: grade I – poor recovery (0-1 points), grade II – average recovery (2-3 points), grade III – good recovery (4-5 points).
The histological grade allocation was as follows: grade-1, 3 to 5 points; grade-2, 6 to 7 points; and grade-3, 8 to 9 points.
The MPI classifies severity in intervals: grade I (< 21 points), grade II (21 to 29 points), and grade III (> 29 points).
The severity of mesenterical involvement (MI) was graded as Grade I (no abnormalities and mesenterical vessel involvement, 0 points); Grade II (a linear and patchy signal in the mesostenium, 1 point); or Grade III (mesenterical effusion, 2 points).
Disc condition was determined using a four-point grading scale.
Russia's five-point grading system now also takes precedence over Ukraine's 12-point scheme.
We use 5- or 7-point grading scales and during cognitive programming the scales are normalized.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com