points for revision

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "points for revision" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing feedback or suggestions for improving a document, project, or piece of work. Example: "After reviewing your report, I have noted several points for revision that will enhance its clarity and effectiveness."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

I agree with the remarks of the first referee, furthermore I would like to add the following points for revision: Table 1: a.

F1000Research

Minor points for revision and comments: When a coding DNA reference sequence is used the following recommendations can be followed according to HGVS; the coding DNA reference sequence should be complete and preferably derived from the  RefSeq database   (format NM_033337.2).

F1000Research

The full reviewers comments are shown at the end of this letter, but the points for revision boil down to the following: 1) You need to more convincingly show that light stimulation in the imaging experiments induces a significant [cAMP] increase in the sperm principal piece.

eLife

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

However, a clear cutoff point for revision for malrotated total knee arthroplasty components could not be identified.

Acta Orthopaedica

However, due to several limitations, a clear cutoff point for revision of malrotated total knee arthroplasty components could not be identified.

Acta Orthopaedica

This has been followed up with discussions amongst the editors and we suggest the following points for a revision of the manuscript.

eLife

Survivorship analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method [ 27] with the end points of revision for any reason, aseptic revision, and radiographic loosening.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Survival with end point of revision for aseptic loosening was 90% for the cups without impaction grafting and 95% for the cups with impaction grafting.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

No wear or "spin-outs" were seen in the third-generation design, which demonstrated a survivorship of 99.4% compared with a first-generation survivorship of 98.3% when an end point of revision for any mechanical reason was used.

Seminars in Arthroplasty

The 10-year survival rate of all cemented cups with end point of revision for any cause was 85%.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

The only report of uncemented cups at 15 years after surgery with an end point of revision for any reason showed a survival rate of 54% [ 20].

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When providing feedback, be specific and actionable. Instead of saying "the introduction needs revision", specify the "points for revision" by stating "the thesis statement is unclear and lacks focus".

Common error

Avoid vague feedback like "needs more detail". Instead, identify specific "points for revision" by suggesting where additional information is needed or which areas require clarification.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "points for revision" functions as a noun phrase that identifies specific aspects or items needing improvement or alteration. It serves to highlight areas requiring further attention and modification, aligning with the Ludwig AI's observation about its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

67%

News & Media

22%

Formal & Business

11%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "points for revision" is a grammatically sound and usable expression to indicate areas needing improvement in a document or project. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, highlighting its primary function as a noun phrase conveying the need for specific alterations. While found in various contexts, it is most prevalent in scientific and technical writing, maintaining a neutral tone. To enhance clarity when providing feedback, it's best to be specific about what those "points for revision" are.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

suggestions for improvement

Replaces "points" with "suggestions" and "revision" with "improvement", focusing on positive changes.

areas for modification

Substitutes "points" with "areas" and "revision" with "modification", emphasizing specific aspects that need altering.

aspects for refinement

Uses "aspects" instead of "points" and "refinement" instead of "revision", highlighting the need for polishing or improving certain elements.

items for correction

Replaces "revision" with "correction", focusing on fixing errors or inaccuracies.

matters for amendment

Substitutes "points" with "matters" and "revision" with "amendment", suggesting formal changes or alterations.

considerations for review

Focuses on aspects needing re-evaluation, rather than direct changes.

recommendations for alteration

Emphasizes suggested changes, using a more formal tone.

issues for adjustment

Highlights problems needing tweaks or calibrations.

targets for improvement

Shifts the focus to setting goals for enhancement.

concerns for addressing

Indicates worries that need to be dealt with in the document.

FAQs

How can I use "points for revision" in a sentence?

You can use "points for revision" to highlight areas that need improvement in a document or project. For example, "The editor provided a list of "points for revision" to improve the clarity of the manuscript."

What are some alternatives to saying "points for revision"?

You can use alternatives like "suggestions for improvement", "areas for modification", or "aspects for refinement" depending on the context.

What is the difference between "points for revision" and "areas for improvement"?

"Points for revision" specifically indicates items that require changes, while "areas for improvement" is a broader term that includes any aspect that can be made better, even if it doesn't necessarily need fixing.

Is it appropriate to use "points for revision" in formal writing?

Yes, "points for revision" is appropriate in formal writing, especially when providing feedback on academic papers, reports, or professional documents. However, in some cases, more formal alternatives like "recommendations for alteration" may be preferred.